LOVED ONES COALITION Weekly Oversight Report

Documenting Systemic Violations Across the Federal Bureau of Prisons

March 9, 2026

This week’s reporting reflects a growing and deeply concerning pattern across multiple Bureau of Prisons regions: deteriorating infrastructure, environmental health hazards, prolonged operational restrictions, barriers to legal access and communication, and medical care disruptions that raise serious questions regarding institutional safety, administrative accountability, and compliance with federal standards governing conditions of confinement.

Across multiple institutions—ranging from high-security penitentiaries to camps and pretrial detention centers—Loved Ones Coalition received corroborating reporting describing prolonged hot water outages, unsafe or discolored water, mold exposure, sanitation supply disruptions, plumbing failures, and pest infestations. Additional reports describe prolonged lockdown conditions, restricted access to psychological services, removal of approved communication contacts, barriers to case management review, and limitations on access to legal preparation resources necessary for incarcerated individuals to work on their cases.

A consistent thread throughout this week’s reporting is the increasing use of broad operational restrictions as a primary management response. Collective lockdowns, communication limitations, suspension of recreation and programming, and movement restrictions appear repeatedly across institutions, often affecting entire housing populations rather than addressing individual incidents through targeted and policy-compliant disciplinary processes.

This week’s report also documents ongoing oversight concerns involving restrictive housing, custodial supervision, and institutional leadership practices. Updated reporting regarding USP Lee includes additional allegations connected to the previously reported death in custody of Malik Lary Carter, including serious claims involving deprivation of basic necessities and delayed intervention during medical distress. Separate reporting from the same facility raises concerns regarding leadership conduct and institutional culture following a compound lockdown incident.

When basic necessities—safe water, sanitation, medical care, humane housing conditions, and protected access to communication and legal resources—are compromised across multiple institutions and regions, the issues presented are no longer isolated facility-level concerns. They represent structural vulnerabilities requiring immediate oversight attention.

Loved Ones Coalition respectfully submits this report to Congress, Senate offices, and federal oversight bodies responsible for monitoring conditions within the Bureau of Prisons. We extend sincere appreciation to the congressional offices, Senate staff, and oversight offices that have already invited our organization to Washington, D.C. to discuss these concerns. We are grateful for the growing number of legislative aides and oversight staff who have taken the time to review our reports, request meetings, and engage directly with the families, formerly incarcerated individuals, and advocates working through this coalition.

We look forward to continuing those discussions in person in April and appreciate the continued attention being given to oversight, transparency, and accountability within the federal prison system. We also welcome additional congressional and Senate offices that may wish to meet with Loved Ones Coalition to review these findings and discuss the systemic concerns reflected in this reporting.

Ongoing oversight is essential to ensuring that federal correctional institutions operate in compliance with the law, maintain safe conditions, and uphold the fundamental responsibilities entrusted to them under federal authority.

MID-ATLANTIC REGION

USP Lee (Virginia) — Death in Custody Updates, SHU Deprivation Allegations, and Leadership Conduct Concerns

1. SUMMARY OF EVENTS & UPDATED REPORTING TIMELINE

Loved Ones Coalition continues to monitor developments at USP Lee following the previously reported death in custody of Malik Lary Carter (Register No. 54089-007) on February 11, 2026.

The prior Loved Ones Coalition report documented early reporting from incarcerated individuals and family members describing a young man in the Special Housing Unit (SHU) whose screams were reportedly audible throughout the unit in the days preceding the incident. Reports circulated prior to identity confirmation alleging prolonged assault and lack of intervention.

The individual was later confirmed to be:

Malik Lary Carter

Age: 30

Date of Death: February 11, 2026

Projected Release Date: March 2026

He was approximately one month from release at the time of his death.

Family reporting indicates:

• Carter was housed alone in SHU.

• Family members were informed he was found “unresponsive.”

• They allege repeated abuse prior to death.

• Carter’s body was returned to his mother already embalmed.

• The family is pursuing independent review.

• The official cause of death has not been publicly released.

Since publication of the prior report, Loved Ones Coalition has received additional reporting from individuals connected to incarcerated persons at USP Lee.

Sources now report that Carter may have been deprived of water for an extended period while housed in SHU.

Additional reporting alleges:

• Carter became severely dehydrated while confined in SHU.

• Incarcerated individuals attempted to alert staff to his deteriorating condition.

• These concerns were allegedly dismissed.

• Carter was reportedly attempting to drink his own urine due to lack of water access.

• Sources also allege he was restrained to a bed prior to his death.

Loved Ones Coalition cannot independently verify these claims at this time. However, the consistency of reporting received from multiple sources raises serious concerns regarding basic necessities, supervision, and emergency medical escalation within restrictive housing.

The timeline continues to raise significant questions regarding:

• SHU monitoring practices

• Staff intervention during medical distress

• Access to water and basic necessities

• Medical response procedures

• Custodial safeguards for isolated prisoners

2. CONDITIONS & ADDITIONAL SYSTEMIC REPORTING

Separate and ongoing reporting from Loved Ones Coalition members regarding USP Lee includes allegations of:

• Extended compound-wide lockdowns lasting weeks

• Collective punishment practices following isolated incidents

• Allegations of restraint use in SHU

• Allegations of water deprivation

• Limited hygiene access

• Restricted communication with families

• Alleged baton use during physical encounters

• Placement in SHU following alleged assault

• Mental health service denial despite documented need

• Alleged threats discouraging contact with regional authorities

• Reports of inadequate wound care

• Confiscation of property and placement in paper undergarments in SHU

This reporting predates the death referenced above and has continued following the incident.

The consistency of allegations suggests potential systemic vulnerabilities in:

• SHU monitoring practices

• Medical escalation procedures

• Use-of-force review mechanisms

• Mental health access

• Retaliation safeguards

• Leadership oversight

3. ADDITIONAL INCIDENT REPORTING

Loved Ones Coalition has also received reporting regarding a separate incident on the compound following the death referenced above.

According to reporting provided to Loved Ones Coalition:

• A correctional officer was reportedly punched in the face while attempting to break up a fight between incarcerated individuals.

• The institution subsequently entered lockdown.

Multiple sources report that during the lockdown announcement, Warden Gilley entered the housing unit and addressed incarcerated individuals directly.

According to reporting received by Loved Ones Coalition, Warden Gilley allegedly stated:

“You n****s wanna assault one of mine? Now y’all locked in for two weeks. No TV. No nothing.”

Sources report that the lockdown restrictions were presented as collective punishment following the incident.

Loved Ones Coalition cannot independently verify the statement at this time. However, allegations that a facility warden used racial slurs while addressing incarcerated individuals raise serious concerns regarding institutional leadership, staff conduct standards, and the broader culture within the facility.

4. KEY ALLEGATION & LEGAL IMPLICATION TABLE

Allegation	Legal / Policy Framework Implicated
Failure to protect from foreseeable harm	18 U.S.C. § 4042(a); Eighth Amendment
Alleged prolonged assault without intervention	Eighth Amendment – Failure to Protect
Alleged excessive force	Eighth Amendment; BOP Use-of-Force Policy
Delay or denial of medical care	Eighth Amendment – Deliberate Indifference; BOP Program Statement 6031.04
Alleged deprivation of water	Eighth Amendment – Basic Human Necessities
Mental health denial despite documented need	Eighth Amendment; Rehabilitation Act
Retaliation for contacting oversight authorities	First Amendment Retaliation Protections
Collective lockdown practices	BOP Operational & Restrictive Housing Policy

Under federal law, the Bureau of Prisons has a non-delegable duty to ensure the safety, care, and protection of individuals in its custody.

Failure to intervene in known risk, failure to provide basic necessities, or deliberate indifference to serious medical or mental health needs may constitute constitutional violations.

5. SYSTEMIC PATTERN CONCERNS

USP Lee continues to be characterized by Loved Ones Coalition members as:

• A high-force, high-restriction environment

• An institution where SHU placement is used aggressively

• A facility where lockdowns are a frequent operational response

• An environment where grievances are discouraged through intimidation

The reported death must be evaluated within this broader institutional climate.

When reports of prolonged assault circulate prior to a custodial death — and the institution enters lockdown — questions of supervisory awareness and response become unavoidable.

New allegations regarding water deprivation and dehydration further elevate concerns regarding basic human necessities and custodial monitoring within restrictive housing environments.

6. SYSTEMIC RISK ANALYSIS

The convergence of:

• SHU confinement

• Allegations of prolonged assault

• Reported audible distress

• Newly reported allegations of water deprivation

• Lockdown following the incident

• Broader reporting of force and deprivation

• Alleged retaliation climate

creates elevated constitutional exposure risk.

Special Housing Units require heightened monitoring due to:

• Isolation vulnerability

• Increased mental health risk

• Higher force exposure probability

• Reduced external visibility

Where supervision, medical escalation, and use-of-force review mechanisms fail simultaneously, systemic breakdown is indicated rather than isolated misconduct.

Failure-to-protect and deliberate indifference claims present significant liability exposure when custodial awareness is reasonably inferable.

7. FORMAL OVERSIGHT NOTICE — USP LEE

Loved Ones Coalition formally requests documentation and clarification regarding:

Full timeline of events preceding February 11, 2026
SHU monitoring logs and staff round documentation
Medical response timeline and escalation procedures
Use-of-force documentation within 72 hours preceding death
Surveillance preservation status for relevant housing areas
Embalming authorization and family consent documentation
Current SHU staffing levels and supervisory ratios
Number of SHU deaths within the past 36 months
Mental health staffing ratios at the time of the incident
Retaliation safeguards protecting individuals who contact oversight authorities
Documentation regarding water access procedures within SHU

Failure to respond to oversight concerns does not negate them.

It expands the documented record of inquiry.

MID-ATLANTIC REGION

USP McCreary (Kentucky) — Prolonged Lockdowns, Staffing Shortages, and Mental Health Access Concerns

1. SUMMARY OF REPORTING

Loved Ones Coalition has received multiple reports regarding current institutional conditions at USP McCreary, including concerns about ongoing lockdown practices, staffing shortages, and access to mental health services.

Sources connected to incarcerated individuals report that the institution has been operating under modified movement and lockdown conditions, which staff have reportedly attributed to low staffing levels.

According to reporting received by Loved Ones Coalition, these operational restrictions have resulted in:

• extended periods of restricted movement

• inconsistent access to normal institutional programming

• limited access to services within the facility

Loved Ones Coalition has also received reports indicating that individuals experiencing mental health crises may be unable to access psychological services in a timely manner.

Sources report that individuals requesting assistance for mental health concerns have allegedly been told that psychological services are unavailable or delayed.

Loved Ones Coalition cannot independently verify these reports at this time. However, the consistency of reporting received raises concerns regarding staffing capacity, mental health service access, and institutional management during extended lockdown conditions.

2. CONDITIONS & ADDITIONAL SYSTEMIC REPORTING

Separate reporting received by Loved Ones Coalition regarding USP McCreary includes allegations of:

• ongoing lockdowns and modified movement schedules

• institutional claims of staffing shortages impacting operations

• restrictions on normal programming and institutional services

• limited access to psychological services for incarcerated individuals

• concerns regarding individuals experiencing mental health crises without timely intervention

Sources report that individuals attempting to seek assistance for mental health concerns may be experiencing delays in receiving evaluation or treatment from psychology staff.

Loved Ones Coalition notes that access to mental health services is a critical component of institutional safety, particularly during periods of restricted movement and elevated institutional stress.

3. KEY ALLEGATION & LEGAL IMPLICATION TABLE

Allegation	Legal / Policy Framework Implicated
Institutional lockdowns related to staffing shortages	BOP Operational & Staffing Policies
Limited access to institutional programming	BOP Institutional Operations Standards
Delays or denial of mental health services	Eighth Amendment – Deliberate Indifference
Failure to provide timely psychological care	BOP Psychology Services Program Statement

Under federal law, the Bureau of Prisons has a non-delegable duty to ensure the safety, care, and medical needs of individuals in its custody.

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Reporting received regarding USP McCreary raises concerns regarding:

• adequacy of staffing levels

• operational stability during lockdown conditions

• access to psychological services

• institutional ability to respond to mental health crises

Periods of prolonged lockdown combined with restricted access to mental health services may increase risks for both incarcerated individuals and institutional staff.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS — USP MCCREARY

Loved Ones Coalition requests clarification regarding:

Current staffing levels at USP McCreary.
The extent and duration of current lockdown or modified movement conditions.
Psychology staffing levels and service availability.
Procedures for responding to incarcerated individuals requesting mental health assistance.
Safeguards ensuring timely access to psychological care during periods of restricted movement.

Failure to provide adequate mental health services within custodial environments may raise serious constitutional concerns.

NORTH CENTRAL REGION

Thomson Camp (Illinois) — Collective Restriction Practices, Communication Contact Removals, and Operational Control Measures

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received multiple reports regarding recurring collective restriction practices at Thomson Camp following discovery of contraband items within the facility.

Reporting indicates that institutional responses to contraband discoveries have included broad operational restrictions imposed across the entire Camp population rather than targeted disciplinary action directed at the individuals involved. Sources report that these measures have occurred repeatedly over time and have included limitations affecting commissary spending, communication access, recreation privileges, and movement within housing areas.

Recent institutional bulletins indicate that following routine shakedowns in early February 2026, additional restrictions were implemented across the Camp population. Measures included reduced monthly commissary limits, reduced electronic messaging allowances, suspension of outdoor recreation, and nightly confinement to housing areas following the evening meal.

Sources indicate these restrictions were initially expected to remain in place until March 19, 2026. However, reporting indicates the restrictions were lifted earlier than scheduled, reportedly on or about March 8.

Additional reporting raises concerns regarding removal of approved email contacts within the Corrlinks system affecting multiple incarcerated individuals. Sources indicate that numerous contacts—including family members and outside advocates—were reportedly removed from approved contact lists during this period.

According to reporting, individuals housed at the Camp were informed during a town hall meeting that the contact removals were conducted intentionally as part of broader institutional control measures. Sources also report that certain commissary restrictions and property limitations were implemented due to staffing shortages.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader questions regarding the use of collective disciplinary restrictions, communication access limitations, and the proportionality of operational responses to contraband incidents within minimum-security facilities.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Camp-wide restrictions imposed following individual contraband discoveries	BOP Program Statement 5270.09 – Inmate Discipline
Suspension of outdoor recreation	BOP Program Statement 5370.11 – Recreation Programs
Reduction of electronic communication access	First Amendment – Communication Rights
Mass removal of approved Corrlinks contacts	BOP Communication Policies
Collective punishment practices affecting entire housing population	Administrative Due Process Standards
Restrictions implemented due to staffing shortages	Institutional Operations Oversight

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “They are deleting people’s contacts on purpose.”

• “SIS told them at a town hall meeting.”

• “They said they don’t have the staff to manage things.”

• “They limited commissary and communication for everyone.”

• “Restrictions were supposed to last until the 19th.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Collective Restriction Practices

Reports indicate that contraband discoveries involving a limited number of individuals have resulted in broad restrictions imposed on the entire Camp population. This raises questions regarding the proportionality of disciplinary responses and compliance with policies emphasizing individualized accountability.

Communication Access Limitations

Sources report that multiple approved Corrlinks contacts were removed during this period, affecting communication between incarcerated individuals and their outside support networks. Such actions may significantly limit family contact and access to outside communication.

Operational Responses to Staffing Shortages

Reports indicate that some restrictions were attributed to staffing limitations within the institution. Operational decisions driven by staffing shortages may impact institutional programming, communication access, and commissary operations.

Duration and Repetition of Institutional Restrictions

Sources report that similar collective restriction measures have occurred repeatedly at Thomson facilities over time. Recurring institutional responses of this nature may raise broader oversight concerns regarding operational policy implementation.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — THOMSON CAMP (NORTH CENTRAL REGION)

Under what authority are camp-wide restrictions imposed following contraband discoveries involving individual incarcerated persons?
What criteria determine when outdoor recreation can be suspended for the entire Camp population?
What procedures govern removal of approved Corrlinks contacts from incarcerated individuals’ communication lists?
Were the reported contact removals conducted as part of a formal investigation or administrative directive?
How many individuals had approved contacts removed during this period?
What oversight exists to ensure disciplinary responses remain individualized rather than collective in nature?
How do staffing shortages affect operational decisions regarding communication access and commissary limitations?

NORTH CENTRAL REGION

FCI Leavenworth (Kansas) — Environmental Health Hazards, Sanitation Supply Instability, Pest Infestation Reports, and Staff Conduct Allegations

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received multiple corroborating reports from incarcerated individuals and family members regarding environmental health concerns, sanitation supply instability, pest infestations, and staff conduct issues at FCI Leavenworth.

Reporting indicates that housing areas within the facility have experienced visible mold contamination on walls and ceilings. Sources report that rather than addressing underlying moisture conditions, staff reportedly attempted to remove visible mold through pressure washing or similar surface cleaning methods. Following this activity, multiple individuals reportedly began experiencing respiratory illness symptoms.

Additional reports describe recurring sanitation supply disruptions, including periods in which toilet paper was reportedly unavailable or inconsistently distributed. While some sources indicate the facility may still possess institutional supplies, others report that access to hygiene materials may be restricted or inconsistently provided.

Reports further indicate environmental sanitation concerns including rodent presence within housing areas and persistent moisture-related conditions that may contribute to mold growth and pest attraction.

Separate reporting raises concerns regarding staff conduct involving a correctional officer identified in testimony as “Escobar.” Sources allege this staff member has been associated with unsafe institutional practices, including actions that may have contributed to inmate-on-inmate violence, alleged contraband placement resulting in SHU placement, and conduct perceived as destabilizing to institutional safety.

Additional reporting indicates the facility may currently be operating under temporary or acting leadership rather than a permanent Warden.

Taken together, the reporting suggests broader concerns regarding environmental health mitigation, sanitation supply management, pest control oversight, and institutional supervision practices.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Mold contamination in housing areas	BOP Environmental Health & Safety Standards
Improper remediation of mold through surface washing rather than environmental correction	Environmental health protocols; facility maintenance standards
Reported respiratory illness following mold disturbance	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care
Inconsistent access to sanitation supplies (toilet paper)	Eighth Amendment – Basic Hygiene Standards
Rodent infestation in housing areas	Environmental sanitation standards
Moisture intrusion contributing to mold growth	BOP Facilities Maintenance Policy
Staff conduct alleged to contribute to institutional instability	BOP Program Statement 3420.11 (Standards of Employee Conduct)
Alleged contraband placement leading to SHU placement	Due process protections; disciplinary procedures
Acting leadership status at institution	Institutional governance oversight

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “They power washed the black mold off the walls and now everyone is sick.”

• “Medical is just giving Tylenol because there are too many people sick.”

• “Black mold covers the ceilings.”

• “There are rats in the building.”

• “We were told the facility was out of toilet paper.”

• “The conditions are getting worse and nobody is fixing it.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Environmental Health & Mold Remediation

Reports indicate visible mold contamination in housing areas. Surface removal methods such as pressure washing may disperse mold spores into the air if underlying moisture sources are not corrected. This may create respiratory health risks and suggests potential deficiencies in environmental remediation procedures.

Respiratory Illness Reporting

Multiple individuals reportedly experienced illness symptoms following mold disturbance. Concerns have been raised regarding the facility’s capacity to medically evaluate individuals reporting respiratory issues and whether environmental exposure assessments were conducted.

Sanitation Supply Stability

Sources describe inconsistent access to toilet paper and other hygiene supplies. Even when institutional supplies exist, inconsistent distribution practices may create sanitation risks and undermine basic hygiene standards.

Rodent Infestation & Environmental Sanitation

Reporting indicates rodent activity within housing areas, potentially associated with moisture intrusion or sanitation issues. Pest presence within correctional housing environments raises health and safety concerns requiring environmental inspection.

Institutional Leadership Stability

Reports suggest the facility may currently be operating under temporary leadership. Transitional administrative structures can create oversight gaps affecting maintenance response, sanitation management, and institutional accountability.

Staff Conduct & Institutional Safety

Sources identify a correctional officer by the name Escobar as associated with allegations of unsafe conduct, including actions perceived to contribute to violence risk and alleged contraband placement leading to restrictive housing placement. While these claims require independent verification, repeated reporting raises concerns regarding supervisory review and staff accountability.

5. STAFF IDENTIFIED IN REPORTING

• Officer Escobar — Correctional Officer, FCI Leavenworth

◦ Allegations of conduct contributing to unsafe institutional conditions

◦ Alleged involvement in contraband placement leading to SHU placement

◦ Allegations of actions contributing to inmate-on-inmate violence

(Staff listed as identified by incarcerated individuals and corroborating sources.)

6. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — FCI LEAVENWORTH (NORTH CENTRAL REGION)

What environmental inspections have been conducted regarding mold presence within housing areas at FCI Leavenworth?
What remediation protocols were used to address reported mold contamination, and were environmental health specialists consulted?
Were air-quality or mold-spore tests conducted following the reported mold removal activity?
How many incarcerated individuals reported respiratory illness symptoms following the environmental disturbance?
What procedures ensure consistent distribution of hygiene supplies such as toilet paper during supply disruptions?
Has pest control inspection documented rodent activity within housing units?
What maintenance measures are being implemented to address moisture intrusion contributing to mold growth?
Is FCI Leavenworth currently operating under a permanent Warden or acting leadership?
What internal review procedures exist when staff conduct allegations involve potential safety risks to incarcerated individuals?
What oversight mechanisms ensure disciplinary actions, including SHU placement, are supported by documented evidence and due process protections?

NORTH CENTRAL REGION

FCI Terre Haute (Indiana) — Infrastructure Leaks, Facility Condition Concerns, and Requests for Direct Leadership Oversight

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received reports from incarcerated individuals regarding infrastructure conditions and facility maintenance concerns at FCI Terre Haute.

Reporting indicates that portions of the facility, including housing areas associated with the Camp and Low-security units, may be experiencing structural leaks during rainfall events. Sources describe conditions in which water reportedly enters interior areas of the building during storms, raising concerns regarding facility maintenance, environmental conditions, and the adequacy of infrastructure repairs.

Additional reporting indicates that incarcerated individuals are requesting that Bureau of Prisons leadership personally inspect the conditions within the Camp and Low-security housing units. Sources express concern that leadership visits may focus primarily on other areas of the institution while potentially overlooking reported infrastructure issues affecting these housing locations.

Incarcerated individuals communicating with families have reportedly asked that leadership directly observe conditions and speak with individuals housed in the Camp and Low-security units regarding facility conditions.

Taken together, the reporting raises questions regarding infrastructure maintenance, facility inspection procedures, and the visibility of reported conditions during leadership visits.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Water intrusion and building leaks during rainfall	BOP Facilities Maintenance Policy
Potential failure to maintain structural integrity of housing units	BOP Facilities Operations Manual
Environmental conditions caused by water intrusion	Environmental Health & Safety Standards
Potential moisture-related health concerns	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care
Lack of direct leadership inspection of reported conditions	Institutional oversight and inspection protocols

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “Tomorrow the Director is supposed to come to Terre Haute.”

• “I bet they won’t go to the Camp or the Medium because it’s raining and the whole building is leaking.”

• “We want leadership to come see the conditions for themselves.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Infrastructure Maintenance & Water Intrusion

Reports indicate that building leaks may be occurring during rainfall events. Water intrusion within correctional housing areas can create environmental health concerns, including moisture buildup, mold development, and deterioration of facility infrastructure if not promptly addressed.

Environmental Conditions in Housing Areas

Persistent leaks or structural moisture exposure may impact living conditions within affected housing units. These conditions may also increase maintenance burdens and create long-term environmental health risks.

Facility Inspection & Oversight Visibility

Sources express concern that institutional inspections or leadership visits may not include areas where infrastructure problems are being reported. When facility conditions vary significantly across housing units, inspection practices that do not include all affected areas may limit visibility of maintenance concerns.

Incarcerated Population Requests for Direct Observation

Individuals communicating with families have requested that leadership directly observe the conditions within the Camp and Low-security housing units. Direct observation can provide institutional leadership with a clearer understanding of facility conditions and maintenance needs.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — FCI TERRE HAUTE (NORTH CENTRAL REGION)

What facility inspections have been conducted regarding reported water intrusion within Camp and Low-security housing units at FCI Terre Haute?
What maintenance repairs have been scheduled or completed to address building leaks during rainfall events?
Have environmental health assessments been conducted to evaluate potential moisture or mold risks associated with water intrusion?
Are infrastructure repairs currently planned for the affected housing areas?
During recent or upcoming leadership visits, which housing areas are included in inspection tours?
What procedures exist to ensure that facility inspections include areas where maintenance concerns have been reported by incarcerated individuals?
What documentation exists regarding maintenance requests or work orders related to reported building leaks?

NORTH CENTRAL REGION

ADX Florence (Colorado) — Chronic Pain Management Disruptions, Medical Record Continuity Failures, and Disability Accommodation Concerns

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received reporting regarding medical care practices at ADX Florence involving the discontinuation or alteration of long-term pain management treatment for incarcerated individuals with documented chronic medical conditions.

Reporting indicates that individuals transferred into the Bureau of Prisons system may experience significant changes to previously established medical treatment plans shortly after arrival at ADX Florence. Sources report that in some cases long-term pain management regimens, including medications prescribed for chronic conditions over extended periods of time, are discontinued or modified prior to the Bureau of Prisons receiving or reviewing the individual’s full historical medical records.

Additional reporting raises concerns regarding treatment decisions that may not fully account for documented chronic illnesses, spinal conditions, cardiovascular complications, and other serious health issues requiring specialized care. Sources report that individuals experiencing severe chronic pain have been treated as though their medical needs are related to dependency concerns rather than documented medical diagnoses.

Reports further describe medical interventions that allegedly resulted in worsening health complications, including the development of new medical symptoms following recent treatment decisions.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader concerns regarding continuity of care during transfers into federal custody, the review of historical medical records before altering long-term treatment plans, and the adequacy of medical oversight for incarcerated individuals with serious chronic health conditions and disabilities within high-security facilities such as ADX Florence.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Discontinuation of long-term pain management treatment without full historical record review	BOP Program Statement 6031.04 – Patient Care
Failure to ensure continuity of care during transfer into federal custody	BOP Health Services Administration Policies
Treatment decisions inconsistent with documented chronic medical conditions	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care
Possible disregard of disability-related medical accommodations	Rehabilitation Act of 1973 § 504
Medical treatment changes resulting in worsening health complications	Eighth Amendment – Deliberate Indifference Standard

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “People with severe spinal issues and chronic illnesses are being treated as if they are drug-seeking.”

• “Recent medical decisions have created new health complications.”

• “Serious pain conditions are not being properly addressed.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Continuity of Medical Care During System Transfers

Individuals entering federal custody from state systems often have extensive medical histories spanning many years. Failure to obtain and review full historical medical documentation prior to modifying established treatment plans may disrupt continuity of care and place medically vulnerable individuals at risk.

Chronic Pain Management Protocols

Reports indicate that long-standing pain management programs may be discontinued or significantly altered shortly after transfer into federal custody. Abrupt modification of established treatment regimens can create significant medical risk for individuals suffering from chronic conditions.

Disability Accommodation Compliance

Sources report that individuals with documented disabilities, including mobility impairments and chronic medical conditions, may not have their existing accommodations fully reviewed before treatment plans are altered. Such circumstances raise concerns regarding compliance with federal disability protection standards.

Medical Oversight and Treatment Review

Reports of rapid treatment changes without complete medical documentation raise questions regarding clinical review procedures for complex medical cases within high-security institutions.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — ADX FLORENCE (NORTH CENTRAL REGION)

What procedures ensure full historical medical records are obtained and reviewed before altering established treatment plans for newly transferred individuals?
What clinical standards govern discontinuation of long-term pain management medications within the Bureau of Prisons?
How does ADX Florence ensure continuity of care for individuals with extensive chronic medical histories transferred from state custody?
What oversight exists to review treatment decisions involving individuals with documented chronic pain conditions?
How does the facility ensure compliance with disability accommodation requirements under the Rehabilitation Act?
What medical review procedures exist when treatment changes result in worsening health complications?

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION

FCC Forrest City (Arkansas) — Ongoing Hot Water Failure, Sanitation Limitations, and Operational Disruptions

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received continued reporting regarding ongoing infrastructure and sanitation concerns at FCC Forrest City.

Sources report that the facility continues to experience prolonged hot water outages affecting housing units and operational areas within the institution. Reporting indicates that hot water remains unavailable in multiple areas of the facility, including food service operations.

Sources report that the booster heater used to sanitize dishes in the facility dishwashing system remains nonfunctional. Without operational booster heating equipment, concerns have been raised regarding the facility’s ability to properly sanitize food service trays, utensils, and kitchen equipment.

Additional reporting indicates ongoing plumbing issues within the institution that continue to disrupt daily operations.

Sources also report that educational and programming classes have been repeatedly cancelled during this period due to operational disruptions within the facility.

At the same time, sources report that influenza-like illness has been circulating widely within the institution. Without reliable access to hot water, individuals report difficulty maintaining basic sanitation practices necessary to reduce the spread of illness.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader concerns regarding facility infrastructure maintenance, sanitation capability within food service operations, and the ability of the institution to maintain safe hygiene conditions during periods of illness outbreaks.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Prolonged hot water outage within the facility	BOP Facilities Maintenance Policy
Nonfunctional booster heater in dishwashing system	BOP Food Service Program Standards
Potential inability to properly sanitize dishes and kitchen equipment	Environmental Health and Food Safety Standards
Ongoing plumbing infrastructure issues	Institutional maintenance standards
Repeated cancellation of educational programming	BOP Program Statement 5350.28 – Literacy and Education Programs
Spread of influenza-like illness without proper sanitation capability	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “There is still no hot water.”

• “The booster heater for the dish machine still hasn’t been fixed.”

• “Classes keep getting cancelled.”

• “The flu is spreading through the facility.”

• “There is no way to properly sanitize without hot water.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Hot Water Infrastructure Failure

Reports indicate that hot water outages have continued for an extended period. Reliable access to hot water is necessary for sanitation, hygiene, and daily institutional operations.

Food Service Sanitation Capability

The reported failure of the booster heater used in dishwashing operations raises concerns regarding whether trays, utensils, and food service equipment are being sanitized according to required health standards.

Public Health and Illness Transmission

Sources report that influenza-like illness is circulating within the facility. Lack of access to hot water may limit the ability of individuals to maintain hygiene practices necessary to reduce illness transmission.

Operational Disruptions to Programming

Repeated cancellation of educational classes and programming may impact rehabilitative programming availability and institutional stability.

Infrastructure Maintenance Oversight

Ongoing plumbing issues and prolonged maintenance delays raise broader questions regarding infrastructure repair timelines and facility maintenance oversight.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — FCC FORREST CITY (SOUTH CENTRAL REGION)

How long has the hot water outage persisted within FCC Forrest City?
When is the booster heater for the food service dishwashing system expected to be repaired or replaced?
What interim sanitation procedures are currently being used in the facility kitchen while the dishwashing booster heater is nonfunctional?
What plumbing repairs are currently underway to restore full water service within the facility?
How many educational programs or classes have been cancelled due to operational disruptions?
What public health measures are currently in place to address influenza-like illness circulating within the institution?

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION

FCI Oakdale I (Louisiana) — Case Management Irregularities, Access to Legal Resources Restrictions, and Administrative Accountability Concerns

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received reporting regarding case management practices and access to legal resources at FCI Oakdale I.

Sources report concerns that routine case management team meetings may not be consistently conducted prior to documentation being presented to incarcerated individuals for signature. Reporting indicates that individuals may be asked to sign documentation related to team reviews without having participated in the required case management meeting process.

Additional reporting raises concerns regarding the handling of First Step Act (FSA) and Second Chance Act (SCA) time credit reviews. Sources report that individuals seeking clarification regarding time credit calculations or risk assessment classifications have experienced difficulty obtaining meetings with assigned case management staff to review or correct potential discrepancies.

Sources also report that individuals attempting to address case management concerns have experienced dismissive or confrontational responses when requesting assistance.

Separate reporting indicates that the room housing the facility’s law library resources—including printing equipment and mailing label access—has reportedly remained closed for an extended period. Sources report that the closure has prevented individuals from accessing materials necessary to print legal documents, prepare filings, or generate mailing labels for legal or personal correspondence.

Additional reporting raises concerns regarding printing access procedures. Sources report that individuals may be required to purchase paper through commissary to print documents despite printing services already being deducted through TruLincs messaging accounts.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader concerns regarding access to case management services, proper execution of team review procedures, and the ability of incarcerated individuals to access legal resources necessary to work on their cases.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Case management team documentation signed without meetings being conducted	BOP Program Statement 5321.07 – Unit Management
Lack of review of FSA / SCA time credit calculations	First Step Act Implementation Guidelines
Inability to address incorrect PATTERN risk assessment classifications	BOP Risk Assessment Procedures
Restricted access to law library resources	Constitutional Right of Access to Courts
Closure of printing and mailing label services	Legal access standards
Possible duplicate charges for printing services	Institutional financial accountability standards

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “Team meetings are not being held before paperwork is signed.”

• “They refuse to meet to correct incorrect risk assessments.”

• “People trying to meet with case management are being dismissed.”

• “The law library room has been closed for weeks.”

• “They are making people buy paper through commissary to print documents.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Case Management Team Meeting Procedures

Reports indicate that documentation related to team reviews may be presented to incarcerated individuals without the required case management meetings occurring. Team meetings are intended to review program participation, risk assessments, and release preparation.

Time Credit and Risk Assessment Review Access

Sources report difficulty obtaining meetings with case management staff to review potential errors related to First Step Act or Second Chance Act credit calculations. Access to case management staff is essential for individuals attempting to correct errors affecting release eligibility.

Access to Legal Resources

The reported closure of the law library resource room raises concerns regarding the ability of incarcerated individuals to prepare legal documents, print case materials, and send correspondence related to their cases.

Printing and Financial Accountability

Reports indicating that individuals must purchase paper through commissary to print documents while printing charges are also deducted through TruLincs messaging accounts raise questions regarding financial transparency and service billing procedures.

5. STAFF IDENTIFIED IN REPORTING

• Case Manager Swofford — FCI Oakdale I

◦ Allegations related to case management meeting procedures

◦ Allegations involving refusal to review FSA/SCA credit concerns

◦ Allegations involving confrontational responses when individuals request assistance

(Staff listed as identified in reporting from incarcerated individuals and corroborating sources.)

6. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — FCI OAKDALE I (SOUTH CENTRAL REGION)

What procedures ensure that case management team meetings occur prior to individuals signing team review documentation?
What process exists for incarcerated individuals to request review or correction of FSA or SCA time credit calculations?
What procedures exist to challenge or review incorrect PATTERN risk assessment classifications?
Why has the law library resource room reportedly remained closed, and when will access be restored?
What printing services are currently available to incarcerated individuals seeking to prepare legal documents?
Are printing costs deducted through TruLincs messaging accounts in addition to requiring individuals to purchase paper through commissary?

SOUTH CENTRAL REGION

FCC Pollock (Louisiana) — Water Quality Concerns, Unsanitary Shower Conditions, and Environmental Health Risks

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received multiple reports regarding environmental health concerns at FCC Pollock involving water quality and sanitation conditions within housing units.

Sources report that water from fountains and plumbing fixtures has been observed with visible blue or green discoloration. Reports indicate that the water has left blue residue around drinking fountains and plumbing fixtures within the facility.

Additional reporting indicates that incarcerated individuals have reported experiencing stomach-related illnesses that they believe may be connected to the facility’s water supply.

Sources also report that staff members working inside the facility may avoid drinking the institutional water supply and instead bring outside bottled water for personal use.

Separate reporting and photographic evidence provided to Loved Ones Coalition shows blue discoloration present in shower areas and water fixtures, as well as significant mold-like buildup and unsanitary conditions within shower ceilings and walls.

Images provided show dark staining and possible mold accumulation along ceiling areas above showers, as well as water discoloration around drains and plumbing fixtures.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader concerns regarding water quality monitoring, environmental sanitation practices, and potential health risks associated with water exposure within the institution.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Discolored water observed in drinking fountains and plumbing fixtures	Environmental Health and Safety Standards
Possible water contamination linked to illness reports	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care
Unsanitary shower conditions and mold accumulation	BOP Environmental Health & Safety Policies
Potential failure to maintain safe plumbing infrastructure	BOP Facilities Maintenance Policy
Staff reportedly avoiding institutional water supply	Institutional health and safety oversight

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “The water is coming out blue/green.”

• “There is blue residue around the water fountain.”

• “People are getting stomach bacteria from the water.”

• “None of the COs drink that water.”

• “They bring gallons of water from outside.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Water Quality Monitoring

Reports of blue or green discoloration in drinking water raise concerns regarding the integrity of plumbing systems and the adequacy of water quality monitoring within the facility.

Potential Health Risks

Reports of gastrointestinal illness potentially associated with the water supply raise questions regarding testing procedures and whether water quality assessments have been conducted.

Environmental Sanitation in Shower Areas

Photographs provided show dark staining and buildup consistent with mold-like growth along ceilings and structural surfaces within shower areas. Poor ventilation and water exposure may contribute to microbial growth if not addressed.

Infrastructure Maintenance

Water discoloration and residue around plumbing fixtures may indicate corrosion within pipes, mineral buildup, or other infrastructure issues requiring maintenance review.

Institutional Health Transparency

Reports that staff may avoid using the institutional water supply raise broader questions regarding internal awareness of potential water quality issues.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — FCC POLLOCK (SOUTH CENTRAL REGION)

When was the last water quality test conducted at FCC Pollock?
Have there been any recent reports of plumbing corrosion or chemical contamination within the water system?
What procedures exist for testing and monitoring potable water inside housing units?
Has the facility conducted environmental inspections regarding mold or microbial growth in shower areas?
What maintenance work orders have been issued to address discoloration observed in plumbing fixtures?
Have any health assessments been conducted regarding reported gastrointestinal illnesses within the facility?

WESTERN REGION

MDC Los Angeles (California) — Pretrial Detention Conditions, Prolonged Isolation, Food Access Concerns, and Medical Care Limitations

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received reporting regarding detention conditions at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) Los Angeles involving concerns about prolonged isolation, food access, medical care availability, and access to rehabilitative programming for individuals held in pretrial custody.

Sources report that individuals housed at MDC Los Angeles may experience extended periods of isolation with limited opportunities for meaningful movement, programming, or rehabilitative activities. Reporting indicates that some individuals may remain confined to housing areas for prolonged periods with minimal access to programming or structured activities.

Additional reporting raises concerns regarding food service practices and access to adequate nutrition within the facility. Sources report allegations of reduced meal portions and inconsistent food access.

Sources also report concerns regarding medical care availability within the facility, including limited or delayed access to medical attention when individuals report health concerns.

Reporting further indicates that individuals held in pretrial detention at MDC Los Angeles may have little access to rehabilitative programming or structured activities intended to support mental and physical well-being during detention.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader questions regarding detention conditions for individuals awaiting trial, access to medical care, food service standards, and the availability of programming within the facility.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Prolonged isolation for individuals in pretrial detention	Due Process Protections for Pretrial Detainees
Limited access to medical care	28 C.F.R. § 549.70 – Medical Care
Food portion reductions and nutrition concerns	BOP Food Service Program Standards
Lack of rehabilitative programming	Institutional programming standards
Conditions alleged to constitute cruel or unusual treatment	Eighth Amendment / Due Process protections

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “He is being subjected to prolonged isolation.”

• “There is little to no medical attention.”

• “Food portions are being reduced.”

• “There is no opportunity for rehabilitation or programming.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Conditions for Pretrial Detainees

Individuals held in pretrial detention are presumed innocent and are generally expected to be housed under conditions that do not constitute punishment. Reports of prolonged isolation and restricted access to programming raise concerns regarding detention practices.

Access to Medical Care

Sources report limited or delayed access to medical attention within the facility. Timely medical care is required to ensure that individuals experiencing illness or injury receive proper evaluation and treatment.

Food Service and Nutrition

Reports describing reduced food portions raise questions regarding food service standards and nutritional adequacy for individuals held within the facility.

Lack of Programming and Structured Activity

Sources report minimal access to programming, rehabilitative activities, or structured movement opportunities. Lack of programming can contribute to deteriorating mental health conditions within detention environments.

5. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — MDC LOS ANGELES (WESTERN REGION)

What housing conditions currently apply to individuals held in pretrial detention at MDC Los Angeles?
What policies govern the use of isolation or restricted movement for pretrial detainees?
What procedures ensure timely medical evaluation when incarcerated individuals request medical care?
What nutritional standards govern meal service at MDC Los Angeles?
What programming or rehabilitative opportunities are currently available to individuals housed within the facility?Here is your section returned exactly, with no wording changed, only clean formatting so it pastes properly into Google Docs like the rest of your report.

NORTHEAST REGION

MDC Brooklyn (New York) — Staff Conduct Concerns, Unit Safety Risks, and Institutional Supervision Issues

1. SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

Loved Ones Coalition has received reporting regarding staff conduct concerns at MDC Brooklyn involving interactions between correctional staff and incarcerated individuals within housing units.

Sources report that a staff member identified as Case Manager Destiny Hicks has been associated with repeated incidents of confrontational communication with incarcerated individuals and alleged unprofessional conduct while interacting with housing unit populations.

Reporting indicates that during a recent housing situation involving placement of a transgender individual within a unit, comments allegedly made by the staff member escalated tensions within the housing environment. Sources report that statements made during the interaction allegedly referenced sensitive allegations regarding individuals housed in the unit.

According to reporting, these comments triggered conflict among incarcerated individuals, resulting in individuals investigating accusations among themselves and escalating tensions within the unit. Sources report that this situation allegedly contributed to violence between incarcerated individuals, including assaults and theft, ultimately resulting in a facility lockdown.

Sources also report broader concerns regarding staff professionalism, conflict management, and supervision practices within the unit environment.

Taken together, the reporting raises broader concerns regarding staff conduct, communication practices, and the potential role of staff actions in escalating tensions within correctional housing units.

2. KEY ALLEGATION & VIOLATION TABLE

Allegation	Policy / Statute Implicated
Staff conduct escalating tensions within housing units	BOP Program Statement 3420.11 – Standards of Employee Conduct
Alleged unprofessional or confrontational communication with incarcerated individuals	BOP Staff Conduct Policies
Statements allegedly contributing to inmate-on-inmate conflict	Institutional safety and supervision standards
Housing unit conflict resulting in violence and lockdown	Institutional security protocols

3. DIRECT TESTIMONY / DIRECT QUOTES

• “She came into the unit yelling and screaming.”

• “Comments were made that caused people to start investigating each other.”

• “People got robbed and assaulted.”

• “The unit ended up going on lockdown.”

• “Staff behavior escalated the situation instead of calming it.”

4. SYSTEMIC CONCERNS

Staff Professional Conduct

Reports describing confrontational communication between staff and incarcerated individuals raise concerns regarding adherence to Bureau of Prisons professional conduct standards.

Conflict Escalation Within Housing Units

Statements made by staff in a housing environment may have significant consequences for safety and stability. Comments perceived as accusatory or inflammatory may escalate tensions among incarcerated individuals.

Housing Placement and Unit Stability

Sensitive housing placement situations require careful management to ensure safety for all individuals involved. Staff communication during these situations may influence the overall stability of the unit.

Institutional Safety and Supervision

Reports indicating that tensions escalated to the point of violence and lockdown raise broader questions regarding supervision practices and staff training related to conflict de-escalation.

5. STAFF IDENTIFIED IN REPORTING

• Destiny Hicks — Case Manager, MDC Brooklyn

◦ Allegations of unprofessional conduct toward incarcerated individuals

◦ Allegations of comments contributing to housing unit conflict

◦ Allegations related to escalation of tensions leading to institutional lockdown

(Staff listed as identified by incarcerated individuals and corroborating sources.)

6. OVERSIGHT QUESTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION — MDC BROOKLYN (NORTHEAST REGION)

What policies govern staff conduct and communication with incarcerated individuals within housing units at MDC Brooklyn?
What training is provided to staff regarding conflict de-escalation and housing unit stability?
What procedures govern sensitive housing placements involving vulnerable populations?
What internal review procedures are triggered when staff actions are alleged to contribute to inmate-on-inmate violence?
Was an internal review conducted regarding the reported housing unit incident and subsequent lockdown?

CONCLUSION

Reporting received by the Loved Ones Coalition from multiple federal correctional institutions across several Bureau of Prisons regions reveals consistent operational concerns involving infrastructure deterioration, staffing shortages, environmental health risks, restricted access to services, and institutional management practices.

Facilities referenced in this report include high-security penitentiaries, medium-security institutions, camps, and pretrial detention centers. Despite these differing security levels, similar patterns appear repeatedly across locations.

These patterns include:

• infrastructure failures affecting sanitation, water systems, and facility maintenance

• staffing shortages resulting in extended lockdowns and service disruptions

• reliance on collective restrictions affecting entire incarcerated populations

• barriers to medical care and continuity of treatment

• restrictions on communication and legal resource access

• concerns regarding staff conduct and institutional supervision

The repeated appearance of these issues across multiple regions suggests that the concerns documented in this report may not represent isolated incidents within individual institutions.

Instead, the reporting raises broader oversight questions regarding the operational stability, staffing capacity, infrastructure maintenance, and institutional management practices within the federal prison system.

The Bureau of Prisons maintains a legal duty under federal law to ensure the safety, care, and basic human necessities of individuals held in federal custody. Conditions that compromise sanitation, access to medical care, environmental safety, or basic institutional services warrant careful review.

Loved Ones Coalition respectfully submits this report as part of its ongoing documentation of institutional conditions and formally requests clarification and oversight review where appropriate.

Continued transparency and accountability are essential to maintaining safe and lawful custodial environments.